Saturday, November 6, 2021

The Flags of Eastern Oregon

Eastern Oregon is Trump Country


One can guess it from the geography. One can see it in the flags.

Oregon is a big place. The Portland-area part of Oregon is yet another west coast deep blue urban place. 

Some of Oregon is a mix of rural and urban in the inland valleys that lie along Interstate 5. Those are characterized by urbanized places with hospitals, businesses, and colleges. They are surrounded by farmland on the valley floors, and huge forested areas that show green on the map below. The urbanized places show on this map as cities on or near the north-south Interstate: Salem, Corvallis, Eugene, Medford, and Ashland.

About 85% of Oregon's population lives close to I-5, either in Portland or one of those cities to the south.




The biggest part of Oregon is the Oregon that barely registers in the popular imagination of "Oregon." It is 15% of the population and 60% of Oregon's land mass. It is the area east of the green national forest land marked on the map, an area that is generally dry and very rural. Geographically and politically, it is part of the Mountain West, more like Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and the Dakotas than it is the rainy, politically-blue Oregon. 

Like most rural places in America now, Eastern Oregon is Trump country. Tam Moore visited it two weeks ago and the flags he saw there caught his eye.

Tam Moore
Tam Moore is a lifelong journalist, who worked in television in his early days and then in print, writing for the Capital Press, a regional newspaper focusing on the agricultural industry. In the mid-1970’s, Moore served as an elected Jackson County Commissioner in southern Oregon. He was elected as a Republican in 1974, back at a time when Oregon Republicans were progressive on civil rights, when there were pro-choice Republicans elected locally and statewide, and when Republicans supported cleaning up the environment.


Guest Post by Tam Moore


There are a host of ways to measure the polarization gripping our country these days. Google tells us 192,000 scholarly papers on the subject are posted on the Internet. Then there’s the world of political polls – they abound – and of cartoons.





During a late October trip across state to visit a long-time friend living in Jordan Valley, the flags of Eastern Oregon tell stories.

The American Flag is flying in Eastern Oregon, just as surely as the American Flag was a visible fixture in many of those images of the January 6 insurrection mob storming the U.S. Capitol in Washington D.C.










In the 1960s, waving the flag became a symbol of the divide between “doves” and “hawks” over our continuing war in Vietnam. The late William Rehnquist, writing as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court said, “throughout more than 200 years of our history (the flag) has come to be the visible symbol embodying the Nation.”




 


There’s a thread of nationalism in the politics which emerged in 21st Century America. Flags help tell that viewpoint. It wasn’t an accident that red from the flag came to be the red of “Make America Great Again” caps and apparel in the 2016 and 2020 Donald Trump election campaigns. 

Over lunch at the Big Loop Pizza in Jordan Valley (population 179) while watching the constant stream of Amazon semi-trailers coming from an Idaho warehouse to destinations in Oregon, we talked politics. My friend observed that someone had said to him “Trump is an S.O.B., but he’s our S.O.B.” In the election one year ago, the Jordan Valley precinct –much larger than the small town itself – recorded seven votes for Joe Biden, 154 for Donald Trump.


 



A frequent alternate to the U.S. flag is the rattlesnake-on-yellow banner attributed to Christopher Gadsden flown in the American Revolution. In 21st Century America the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag emerges as an expression of personal freedom and individualism, to quote one modern dictionary.




These are prosperous and independent people flying their flags. In Jordan Valley the economy is based on cattle ranching with grazing and feeding on deeded land in the winter. Most of the cattle graze public lands for half the year while hay for winter feeding grows on the deeded lands. Another part of the local economy comes and goes with mining of silver and other precious metals in nearby mountains. Both sectors of the economy – and elsewhere in Eastern Oregon you can add in timber, mostly grown on public lands – bring friction between residents and federal land managers. People talk politics because livelihoods depend on continuing relations with the federal government, and how the government and courts interpret environmental laws.



One year after the presidential election which replaced Donald Trump, a “Trump 2024” flag flew in the precinct of North Lake County where Trump polled 77 votes in 2020 – that was 71 percent of the votes cast. There’s a new slogan on the 2024 flag: Make votes count again.


 

It’s not all politics with the flags of Eastern Oregon. This banner configured to recite the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution flies over over a gate east of Christmas Valley in North Lake County. It's a precinct where last November’s vote was Trump 42, Biden zero.

But flying from both gateposts are two more flags. Both fan-flags for the Seattle Seahawks. You can imagine the folks at the other end of the long ranch road would as soon talk about the fortunes of Quarterback Russell Wilson as those of the divided country in which we live.















12 comments:

Rick Millward said...

"When Fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross".

New word:
Noun
vexillolatry

(theology) The worship of a flag or flags.


Ironically, the use of the flag as a personal symbol came from the Civil War, in opposition to the Confederate flag. Now that it has been banished from the public square as a repudiation of Jim Crow, Regressives have seized on Old Glory as their standard.

There are laws regarding the desecration of the American flag, for instance using it as decoration or clothing, but it's generally tolerated as free speech.

(i)"The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown."
(4 U.S.Code Sec. 8(i))

So much for that.



Mike said...

Our flag stands for the founding principles of our republic. People who support Trump are supporting someone who tried to overturn a free and fair election and who continues to undermine our democracy. It would be deplorable if we allowed a symbol of liberty and justice for all to be appropriated by the Insurrection Party.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Jonathan Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory tells us that there are 6 components underlying the moral and political decisions that people make:

1) Care/harm
2) Fairness/cheating
3) Loyalty/betrayal
4) Authority/subversion
5) Sanctity/degradation:
6) Liberty/oppression

Haidt’s studies have shown that liberals mainly care about the first two, while conservatives care pretty much equally about all of them. I think it’s pretty obvious that people who care about items 3, 4, and 6 would be much more likely to emphasize patriotism and the display of the US and Gadsden flags. These are fundamental differences between people which quite possibly have a genetic component.

In order to bring this country together and overcome the current polarization, it will be necessary for all of us to understand that people can be very different from each other, but we nevertheless have a responsibility to accommodate those differences and forge sensible compromises.

Art Baden said...

Caring about black people not getting arrested for “driving while black” or “running through a white neighborhood while black” seems pretty clearly to correlate to # 6: liberty:oppression.

Caring about black people being pushed into the pavement by police and asphyxiated to the point of having the life taken from them seems to correlate well to #5: sanctity (of life) / degradation.
Caring about respecting our political institutions and finding abhorrent a rabble invading our nation’s Capitol seems to correlate well to # 4: authority / subversion.
Caring about anti Vaxers invading school board meetings across the country, physically threatening elected school board members and obnoxiously disrupting legal political proceedings seems to correlate well to #3: loyalty / betrayal.

I think the distinction is applying these values to others, or just to oneself or ones own tribe. Perhaps the distinction between liberals and conservatives is NOT the values themselves, but ones interest in applying them to others?

Mike said...

To Michael T:

There's nothing sensible about accommodating sedition.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Art,

You should read up on Haidt’s research. The point isn’t to come up with definitions of the moral foundations that can apply to liberals as well as conservatives. The point is to understand the source of the different orientations conservatives and liberals have.

It’s not about saying anything bad about either side. It’s about understanding the difference.

Michael Trigoboff said...

Mike,

You could try opening your mind. You might enjoy it.

It’s a lot nicer living in a world of interestingly different people than it is inhabiting a world in which you are surrounded by devils.

John C said...

Mike and Michael,
One of the problems with MFT is that it's a theory - not confirmed fact. Haight (whom I like and respect btw) and his team of social scientists used polls and surveys to find human values across people groups and he created this taxonomy. As I recall, it accounts for about 70% of the respondents of these surveys. That means almost a 1/3 of all people don't fall into these categories. I'm not a statistician but that seems like a pretty big outlier.

The second weakness I see is what Daniel Kahneman asserts as the illusion of humans as rational beings. We humans answer questions intuitively about what we like to believe about ourselves, but may in fact not be our values at all. This isn't to say MFT isn't a noble effort, but perhaps we should take it in proper context. I thought back-and-forth here was ironic given the Pearls cartoon Peter included in today's post.

Mike said...

Just to clarify, this isn't a question of being open-minded. I've worked on projects with all kinds of people, the Bay Area Rapid Transit being one of them. We had different opinions about lots of things, but in our work we shared the same goal and accepted basic facts, such as how long the concrete should set before we took down the shoring.

By the same token, election results aren't a matter of opinion, any more than climate change is. You're entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.

Low Dudgeon said...

Mike—

Just to clarify?

Perchance did you ever assert after the 2000 election that Dubya was “se-lected”, not truly elected? Do you (still) believe that Officer Sicknick was killed by January 6 rioters? If not now, did you believe it at first after the WaPo, NYT and CNN reported it?

Regardless, the real point is that everyone who disagrees with you on transactional opinion or even fact is not thereby the worst class of person in the world. Sure, ironclad universal truths exist. It’s just that you’re rather, um, liberal in your assignment thereof.

Mike said...

Dungeon---

Mike said...

To Low Dudgeon:

I accepted that "W" as president whether I liked it or not. I don't know the details of all the injuries inflicted by the insurrectionists. I never said those who disagree with me are the worst class of person in the world. I just said those who tried to overthrow the government are seditious, and those who support them are un-American. Now that you mention it, I suppose the Constitution is pretty liberal.