Saturday, April 4, 2026

An Easter weekend reflection on human dignity

"When they stop seeing others as human beings and reduce them to pieces in a geopolitical game, they lose the moral compass required to prevent future conflicts."
          Cardinal Blase Cupich
I will let college classmate Larry DiCara speak for me during this Easter weekend. Larry grew up in the working-class Dorchester neighborhood of Boston. He was a standout at Boston Latin School, then at Harvard. At age 22 he became the youngest person ever elected to the Boston City Council, which then led to a long career as a lawyer helping shape the extraordinary turnaround of Boston over the past five decades. He is the author of Turmoil and Transition in Boston: A Political Memoir from the Busing Era.

Larry Dicara, with his three daughters

Guest Post by Larry DiCara



Dred Scott and Cardinal Cupich

Human dignity has been a frequent topic of discussion throughout our 250 year history. In 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the Dred Scott Decision. While Taney was drafting his decision, U.S. Senator Charles Sumner was arguing that the rights of the people emanated not only from the Constitution but also from the Declaration of Independence which preceded it. 

 

Andrew Jackson appointed Taney. Supreme Court appointments were quite routine in those days. With the exception of the Brandeis nomination early in the 20th Century, no major battles ensued until Nixon nominated Clement Carswell and Harold Haynsworth as part of his obeisance to U. S. Senator Strom Thurmond (R-SC). 

 

The Dred Scott Decision said that Black Americans have been “regarded as beings of an inferior order, all together unfit to associate with the white race…and so inferior, that they have no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Most religious leaders remained silent. 

 

More than 150 years later, we are in a similar place in American history. Service members and families who have lost loved ones say the Trump team’s memes and jokes trivialize combat and sacrifice. Many of our religious leaders have remained silent. Others have not. The Pope made a very strong statement on Palm Sunday stating that God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them, saying: ‘Even though you make many prayers, I will not listen: Your hands are full of blood.’” Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago wrote in The Washington Post: 

When people treat war as entertainment, they surrender their humanity. When they allow their consciences to be dulled by the allure of easy profit, they step away from what God desires for his children. When they stop seeing others as human beings and reduce them to pieces in a geopolitical game, they lose the moral compass required to prevent future conflicts. 

In 2026, we are dealing with questions of human rights, and we need to hear the voices of other religious leaders! Thousands of children, the majority of whom are of Latin heritage, are in ICE custody. They live in subhuman conditions. They do not go to school. They live in a large cage and are treated the same way Roger Taney wanted Black people to be treated. 

 

Congressman Andy Ogles (R-Tenn) recently called for all Muslims to be denaturalized and deported: “Muslims don’t belong in American society…pluralism is a lie….” Ogles posted on X. To me this sounds mighty familiar to the thinking of Hitler and his lackeys who called for Germany to be “Judenrein” - free of Jews. Jeff Jacoby, writing in The Boston Globe, reminded us that “demonizing religious minorities is a tradition as old as the Republic and politicians were exploiting it to win followers long before social media existed.” Our “call of duty” Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth invited Doug Wilson, his pastor, to conduct a prayer service at the Defense Department. Wilson has stated plainly that in his vision of a Christian nation, anything Protestants consider “public displays of idolatry” would be prohibited. Catholic parades and processions fall squarely within that definition. Are we going backwards as a country? Hegseth, in addition to treating war like a video game, now also facilitates attacks on organized religion. Our national leaders have created two lists: one of the accepted and one of the rejected. Are his policies why so many no longer feel invited to serve our country, as confirmed by essays quoting retired generals? Does he want our military to be all tall white “Christian” men with good hair? 

 

Do some of our religious leaders only selectively read scripture? Do they not understand the very clear messages in the Bible and other sacred texts as to the dignity of human beings and each person’s being identified as a child of God? I recall the words of Pope Francis, who always reminded us that we are all brothers and sisters – “fratelli tutti.” Our national leaders have created two lists: one of the accepted and one of the rejected. Perhaps there was not enough political courage among religious leaders 150 years ago. Perhaps there is not enough political courage today, given that some of those who wave the Bible do not open it very often, preferring Project 2025 to Matthew: 25!



[Note: To get daily delivery of this blog by email go to Https://petersage.substack.com. Subscribe. The blog is free and always will be.]



7 comments:

  1. Criminals dehumanize and label which enables victimizing them. If you want to do something wrong to someone, label them first, that way you aren’t really hurting a person, you’re hurting the label you put on them. I guess it’s a bigger subset of people than just criminals, it’s people who want to lose their moral compass.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Gaza, we have subsidized the slaughter of over 72,000 people, mainly women and children. In order to find that acceptable, you would have to consider them less than human. Now Trump is threatening to bomb 93 million Iranians back to the stone age. It’s our new “warrior ethos.” Hooah!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In Gaza, we have subsidized the slaughter of over 72,000 people, mainly women and children.

      “Mainly” according to Hamas, which is a well-known source of reliable information.

      Sarcasm aside, more reliable sources of information report that at least half of the casualties in Gaza were Hamas fighters, who by definition are valid military targets.

      Delete
    2. ...more reliable sources of information report...

      So, what's your source? Data from an internal Israeli database indicate that at least 83 percent of Palestinians killed in Israel's onslaught on Gaza were civilians,
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/aug/21/revealed-israeli-militarys-own-data-indicates-civilian-death-rate-of-83-in-gaza-war

      Delete
  3. “Do some of our religious leaders only selectively read scripture?”

    And yet the late Pope Francis (“All religions are paths to God”) is then cited with approval? Perhaps the correct approach is to be selectively selective.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A little Easter update –
    This is a toot that came out of the big tRump on “Truth” Social: “Remember when I gave Iran ten days to MAKE A DEAL or OPEN UP THE HORMUZ STRAIT, Time is running out – 48 hours before all Hell will reign down on them. Glory be to GOD!”

    He is obviously insane, as are those who still support him.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is worthwhile to read Taney's decision in Dred Scott. For decades, it's been cited as the "worst Supreme Court decision" ever. I decided to read it and you now what? It reads just like decisions written by today's Court! Taney is quoted above but he was not stating his personal opinion; he was stating the facts of the state-of-mind of virtually all of "civilized" Americans and certainly many of the authors of our Constitution. Page after page of the decision cites so many laws in force at the time of ratification that proved his very point; originalist in the extreme. Taney even wrote that if he were to base his thinking on his present day, his decision would be different. But he felt obligated to follow the intent of the founders based on overwhelming evidence. That said, Taney desired his outcome and, like today's Court, he found a path to it.

    ReplyDelete

ATTENTION.

Do not be surprised or disappointed if you post anonymously and the comment never appears.

Comments attributed to other people are forwarded to local law enforcement for investigation and prosecution. Identity theft is a Class C felony.

Don't copy and paste plagiarized material.